Showing posts with label Joan the Fair Maid of Kent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joan the Fair Maid of Kent. Show all posts

24 June 2014

HEA or Not: Edward, the Black Prince and Joan, the Fair Maid of Kent


"The Most Amorous Woman in England"

 

Carving reputedly of Joan of Kent.

Back in February, I wrote a post about the first Prince of Wales, Edward of Woodstock, and his romance with Joan, the Countess of Kent.  (See here.)   (Note that both "the Black Prince" and "the Fair Maid of Kent" are apparently posthumous monikers.)  Appropriately for Valentine’s Day, my February post told the romantic legend of Edward and Joan’s love story. Now, I’m going to tell you what history claims. 
Not to rehash that previous information, but Edward, son of King Edward III, by all accounts fell in love with the Countess, perhaps even when they were children.  The story picks up when they were grown and she was a widow who had already been married to two husbands. 
That is, two husbands at the same time. 
Even by the sympathetic chronicler Froissart she was called the "most beautiful lady in England, and by far the most amorous." 
The historically accepted wisdom of the clandestine marriages of Joan of Kent is that at the age of twelve, she and Sir Thomas Holland exchanged vows, telling no one.  Holland was a full-fledged knight and fighting man, twelve years older than she.  Roughly a year later, when Holland was off at war, her parents arranged for her to marry Sir William Montacute (or Montague), a boy about her own age, who later succeeded his father as the Earl of Salisbury.

Making the story even more complicated, Joan was “adopted” by the royal family and spent much of her childhood with them, presumably including the portion during which she married Holland.  Did she tell the king and queen, or her parents, about her secret marriage before she married Salisbury?  If not, why not?  If so, why did they ignore her?
Joan's first husbands.  Sir Thomas Holland (L) and the Earl of Salisbury (R).
And if she was, indeed married already, how could she stand before a priest and take vows, knowing she was no doubt committing a mortal sin and would go to Hell?

We have no answers to these questions.

Later in the year she was married, when Holland returned from the war, we are told that he claimed her as his wife by their previous vow.  We are also told that her current husband (only about thirteen, as Joan was) objected to Holland’s claim.  What happened next?  Over the next few years, Holland travelled between England and the war on the continent.  In that war, he fought beside William Montacute’s father, at that time the earl.  When he returned to England, he served as Joan’s husband’s steward.
When I was doing my research for SECRETS AT COURT, set around the marriage of Edward and Joan, I discovered this with astonishment.  If true, the situation is this:  Holland has said “she’s my wife, not yours,” but for several years, he works intimately with his “wife’s” current husband and family.  He does not pursue legal remedies to take her back for five years.  (The explanation was that he lacked money to take the petition to the church courts.  Strange, if true, that her husband would pay him to be a steward if the money was going to be spent making the case to take his wife away!)
Again, one must wonder what her husband, parents, and Joan herself were thinking during these years.  Why would they accept Holland as a member of the household?  History does not tell us.
Finally, on the battlefield in France, Holland took an esteemed French hostage and received a hefty ransom for him.  Received it, in fact, from King Edward, who must have known how he would use it, for this was presumably the money he needed to launch a legal offensive. 
After several years, and a petition to the Pope, Holland’s claim was accepted and Joan’s marriage to Salisbury was put aside.  She and Holland lived as husband and wife for eleven years and had five children.  He died in France, with her beside him, and she returned to England a widow.
Within a few months, she had secretly married Prince Edward.  A few months.
Prince Edward, kneeling before his father,
accepting responsibility for Aquitaine.

 
Granted, they had known each other since childhood, but such haste does seem, at the very least, questionable.  And although she had been respectably married for eleven years, her background was certainly not one considered suitable for a future queen of England, which may be the reason they did not wait for permission.

But the two lovebirds had an obstacle even greater than her past.  According to the church, they were too closely related to receive permission to marry.  (Both were grandchildren of Edward I.)  In order to wed, they would have to petition the Pope for dispensation from the church laws of consanguinity, a lengthy process.

But they did not wait and as a result, in 1361, the heir to the throne was married to a woman forbidden to him by the church.  This state of affairs could not be allowed to continue and with the help of his father the king, a petition was sent to the Pope for dispensation and permission they should have obtained before they exchanged vows. (You would think Joan might have hesitated to do the whole secret wedding again, since that’s exactly how she got into trouble the first time.  On the other hand, she also knew that such a marriage had a good chance of being upheld, meaning everyone would just have to accept her slightly checkered past.) 
There was a new Pope by this time and, ultimately, he upheld the wedding.  One wonders whether the one who wrestled with Joan’s first marriages would have been so accommodating.
Yes, truth is stranger than fiction, if this story can be believed, and yet, it is still repeated by historians with a straight face.  It raised enough questions for me, however, to spark SECRETS AT COURT, where I created my own explanation for the facts we know.
And what about the happily ever after?  Did Edward and Joan have it?
Richard II, Edward & Joan's son.

They did remained happily married, apparently, for the remainder of Edward’s short life.  Prince Edward continued his record of successful leadership in war but died before his father, at the age of 46, leaving his son to wear the crown.  Thus, Joan, the first Princess of Wales, never became queen of England.   

Shortly after their marriage, they went to Aquitaine to rule over what was left of Edward III’s French possessions.  Their first son, born more than three years after their wedding, died at age five or six.  Their second son, two years younger, became Richard II and sat on the English throne. 

After Edward’s death, Joan did not remarry, though she lived another nine years.  She was very influential in the court of her son, but her last days were sad.  One of her Holland sons was condemned to death by the king for killing another noble.  She spent the last days of her life pleading for his release, which only came the day she died.  

At her death, she was buried, as she had asked, not beside her royal husband, but “near the monument of our late lord and husband, the Earl of Kent.”
Thomas Holland.
 

  After many years in public relations, advertising and marketing, Blythe Gifford started writing seriously after a corporate layoff. Ten years and one layoff later, she became an overnight success when she sold her first book to the Harlequin Historical line.  Since then, she has published ten romances set in England and on the Scottish Borders.  SECRETS AT COURT, a Royal Wedding story, was a March release from the Harlequin Historical line.  For more information, visit www.blythegifford.com
Author photo Jennifer Girard



 

09 March 2014

Author Interview & Book Giveaway: Blythe Gifford on SECRETS AT COURT

Today, we welcome Blythe Gifford, a long time contributor to the Unusual Historicals blog.  Her tenth novel, SECRETS AT COURT from the Harlequin Historical line, has just been published.  (Excerpt here.)  She’s offering a free print copy to one randomly chosen commenter, so leave a comment at the end of the interview for a chance to win.

First, here’s a bit about the book.

THE THRONE OF ENGLAND IS AT STAKE!

Anne of Stamford has long been the keeper of her mistress's secrets, but when Lady Joan marries the king's son, court life becomes ever more perilous. Sir Nicholas Lovayne has arrived to uncover the truth about Lady Joan's past, and Anne must do something—anything—to throw him off….

Longing to escape the intrigues at court, Nicholas hasn't counted on the way Anne distracts him—her refusal to accept pity for her clubfoot touches something deep inside him. Will he be able to follow his duty when every fiber of his being tells him to protect Anne?

After forays into stories set in Scotland and into self-publishing, you are back in 14th century England publishing with Harlequin.  What lead to that?

I never left Harlequin.  The self-publication of THE WITCH FINDER was concurrent with work on this Royal Weddings series.

The court and era of Edward III of England was my romance “home” and the setting for my first four books.  Even HIS BORDER BRIDE, my first to be set in Scotland, included King Edward’s (fictional!) bastard nephew as the hero.  So it was a surprise to realize I have now published five Scottish set stories.  This evens the count!  But seriously, the “Royal Weddings” idea grew out of an English royal wedding, so it belonged there.

This staircase plays a key role in the book.
What was the genesis of the story?

When Prince William and Kate Middleton married, the Harlequin Historical line released a series of short stories that looked back at British royal weddings of the past.  I was invited to participate, but had too many deadlines on my plate at the time.  I loved the idea, though, and I envisioned a full-length book using the premise.  I did consider a wide range of possibilities, including weddings of Queen Victoria’s many children, but the medieval court of Edward III is familiar territory and feels like family.  Unlike most royals, his two oldest children married for love, so that seemed to be a natural fit.

Can you tell us about this story?  

SECRETS AT COURT is set around the wedding of the oldest son of Edward III, also an Edward.  History knows him as the Black Prince.  (As an aside, he was the first Prince of Wales.)  His chosen bride, Joan, the Fair Maid of Kent, had a bit of a scandalous past and they, in essence, “eloped” and married without the church’s consent.  My hero, Nicholas, is charged with untangling the mess they made and getting the Pope’s dispensation for their marriage.  My heroine, Anne, who has been with Joan all her life, is the keeper of her lady’s secrets.  Secrets that, if Nicholas discovers them, could destroy the throne of England.  (For the full historical background, see my post from February, The Prince Who Married for Love's Sake.)

You have always included real history in your books.  What made this one different?
I’ve had real historical figures and events before, but this is the first time the plot revolved around a specific event.  The complexities of Lady Joan’s marriages, and the timelines, were critical to both the plot and my characters’ backstories.  In some ways, it had more in common with an historical fiction plot than an historical romance plot, though it is definitely a romance!

Found a few drawings of the castle during this period.
Was it hard to research the complexities of medieval church laws concerning marriage and the other parts of the story?

Strangely enough, despite the fact that there is no full-scale biography of Joan of Kent, there have been a couple of scholars who delved into her life and marriages.  I even found copies of some of the papal pronouncements, so I felt comfortable with the accuracy there.  Beyond that, my heroine, Anne, was born lame, so I tried hard to be true to the reality she faced, both physically and in dealing with the attitudes of the time.  Even with that, my most difficult research challenge was something quite different.

So what was the hardest part to research?

My research of Windsor's Floor Plan in 1361-62!
Windsor Castle!  You see, King Edward was involved in a massive rebuilding of the castle between about 1350 and 1377.  This story takes place in 1361-1362 and, for the most part, is set at Windsor.  As an author who needs to feel grounded in her characters’ physical world, I spent hours trying to figure out what parts of the project had been completed at that time and which were still to come.  It took several books and much online searching, but the final, most helpful piece was The Royal Guide to Windsor Castle by Sir William Henry St. John Hope, published in 1920 and available via a research library near me.  It has beautiful, color coded floor plans, and I ended up taking dozens of iPhone pictures as notes, which I'm using here.

What’s next? 

I’m finishing up the next Royal Weddings story, WHISPERS AT COURT.  No publication date yet, but I’ll be sure to let the Unusual Historicals family know.

So, readers:  what makes you feel as if you are truly embedded in the historical world of the book?  Is it the physical descriptions?  Attitudes and behaviors that are far from our modern perspectives?  Or something else?  Leave a comment below for a chance to win a copy of SECRETS AT COURT. 

 
After many years in public relations, advertising and marketing, Blythe Gifford started writing seriously after a corporate layoff. Ten years and one layoff later, she became an overnight success when she sold her first book to the Harlequin Historical line.  Since then, she has published ten romances set in England and on the Scottish Borders.  The Chicago Tribune has called her work "the perfect balance between history and romance."  For more information, visit www.blythegifford.com or www.facebook.com/BlytheGifford or follow her on Twitter @BlytheGifford.

20 February 2013

Scandalous Affairs: It’s Complicated or The Scandalous Love Life of Joan of Kent


Joan_of_KentBy Ginger Myrick

In my second book, The Welsh Healer: A Novel of 15th Century England, I make passing reference to Edward, the Black Prince, and his involvement with Joan, the Fair Maid of Kent. What is well-known by enthusiasts of the era is that the pair eventually settled down into a respectable marriage, producing the future King Richard II of England. But in their youth, their relationship was much more complex as were the circumstances surrounding it. When Joan was only two years old, her father, Edmund of Woodstock, 1st Earl of Kent, was executed for treason, and her mother was placed under house arrest with her four newly fatherless children. Good King Edward III, being a chivalrous young man, took pity on the widow and brought his cousins to court where they enjoyed a privileged and comfortable childhood alongside his own children, who were only slightly younger than the Kentish brood and included the future Black Prince. With her vivacious personality, Joan quickly made herself a favorite of the new king and queen, but as with many spoiled young women with such an impetuous and passionate nature, when she hit puberty, all hell broke loose.

jkJoan was reputed to have been the most beautiful woman of her time in all of England, and it seemed she used her assets to their full advantage. At only twelve years of age, she flouted the rules of court requiring royal consent for marriage between couples of high rank and secretly eloped with Thomas Holland, a young man from another noble family. As with many unions that start out under such dubious origins, everything may very well have turned out satisfactorily had Thomas not been sent overseas for military duty. During his absence, Joan was compelled to marry an unsuspecting William Montacute, heir to the Earldom of Salisbury, and failed to mention the fact that she was previously engaged. This was an extremely dangerous position for the young woman and especially perilous for her soul. Not only would she be looked upon as a bigamist and traitoress by the whole of England, she would also be seen as an adulteress by the church and by God himself. There are some theories suggesting the Fair Maid had convinced herself that her marriage to Holland was invalid, but perhaps it simply slipped her mind … for nine years. Needless to say that when Thomas Holland returned from abroad, he did not receive the loving welcome he anticipated. Instead he was faced with William’s—by then Earl of Salisbury—wrath and reluctance to part with his significant other, demonstrated by his imprisonment of said lady in her own home. But the jilted husband would not be turned away so easily and appealed to the heads of both church and state to have his wayward wife returned. In 1349, Pope Clement VI granted the annulment, and Joan was sent back to her original spouse; no harm, no foul. The Hollands lived in a state of serene domesticity for the next eleven years and were blessed with several progeny, a sign of God’s ultimate forgiveness.

bp-face  But alas, Joan’s early indiscretions could not be erased so easily. When her patient and forgiving husband, Thomas, died in 1360, her penchant for secret pacts, which had so unfortunately resulted in the previous scandal, reared its controversial head again. This time around, the victim of her charm was her cousin Edward, the Black Prince. There are several documented instances of Edward’s affection for his fair cousin, and after her return to a marriageable status, the hope to make her his was rekindled. Because of Joan’s earlier entanglements, the king and queen would not approve their union, so the pair were clandestinely contracted to wed. Joan and young Edward were first cousins once removed, which means that Joan’s paternal grandfather was also Edward’s paternal great-grandfather, King Edward I of England, a.k.a. Longshanks and Hammer of the Scots. To our modern-day sensitivities, this may seem a valid argument against their union, and it must have also appeared so to Edward’s parents. The regents initially used the excuse of consanguinity to withhold their consent and nullify the betrothal, but seeing that there was true love between the two, the king eventually conceded and requested a dispensation from the pope. The lovebirds were officially married in October of 1361, and the Fair Maid settled down to become a dutiful wife and mother, at one point even raising an army to protect her husband’s principality of Aquitaine while he was 
177px-Edward_III_of_England_(Order_of_the_Garter)otherwise occupied in Castile. 

Now, if you will excuse a quick digression, I would also like to address the popular claim that Joan’s beauty was so legendary that she inspired an entire order of chivalry during a dance with her eventual father-in-law, King Edward III. The account states that while engaged in a rondelet, or other such energetic frolic, her garter slipped from her leg, evoking many derisive snickers by onlookers and other signs of their contempt for her questionable respectability. The king, who at the time took much pride in his own reputation of fidelity to his beloved Queen Philippa, is said to have returned the piece of frippery to the Fair Maid and declared, "Honi soit qui mal y pense,”—Shamed be the person who thinks evil of it. The phrase became the motto for The Most Noble Order of the Garter, the highest of the honors system in the United Kingdom today. The Fair Maid’s troubles may look to have been easily avoidable and rather ridiculous to the casual observer, but there are some people in the world who are suckers for love and love to be in love. Joan of Kent appeared to be one of these.

Eleanor_HibbertHer very public foibles can be summed up with a quote from one of my favorite authors, the incomparable Jean Plaidy. “How stupid lovers can be! But if they were not, there would be no story.” It is from her novel, The Courts of Love, and sounds tailor-made for Joan’s situation. Ridiculous? Maybe. Stupid? Perhaps. Scandalous? Absolutely, but far be it from me to pass judgement … and, ‘Shamed be the person who thinks evil of it!’

Ginger Myrick was born and raised in Southern California. She is a self-described wife, mother, animal lover, and avid reader and knitter. Along with the promotion for THE WELSH HEALER, and EL REY, she is currently crafting her third novel, which takes place during the U.S. Civil War. She is a Christian who writes meticulously researched historical fiction with a ‘clean’ love story at the core. She hopes to persevere with her newfound talent and show the reading community that a romance need not include graphic details to convey deep love and passion.