Showing posts with label John Issitt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Issitt. Show all posts

14 February 2014

New & Noteworthy: February 14

Happy Valentine's Day everyone! Here is this month's news from our contributors.

John Issitt is hosting a free giveaway of his novel AGENTS OF REASON for the Kindle now through February 18! You can download a free copy at the Kindle Store, Amazon.co.uk or Amazon.com.

• In celebration of Black History Month, Ginger Myrick is continuing the sale on her latest novel BUT FOR THE GRACE OF GOD all month long — just $2.99 for Kindle and Nook versions. www.gingermyrick.com

Blythe Gifford’s SECRETS AT COURT, the first of two medieval Royal Wedding stories, is a March release from Harlequin Historical. Here's the blurb:
The king’s son has married for love and now, Sir Nicholas Lovayne must persuade the church to bless the union. But Anne of Stamford knows something about the prince’s bride: a secret that must be kept at any cost. Even that of her life. While the hero and heroine are fictional characters, the events in the story are true, and Gifford has taken a close look at a little studied historical mystery of Edward III’s reign. 
Print version is available February 18, and e-book will go on sale March 1.

Michelle Styles has unveiled the cover art for her upcoming novel RETURN OF THE VIKING WARRIOR, which goes on sale at Harlequin Historical this May.

Kim Rendfeld's debut novel THE CROSS AND THE DRAGON recently received two more glowing reviews. Medievalists.net says "Rendfeld skillfully presents what might have been facts, and entertains the reader at the same time." And Melysah Reviews Books says, "This book reminds me of a Nathaniel Hawthorne quote, 'Easy reading is damn hard writing.'"

03 November 2013

Author Interview: John Issitt

This week, we're pleased to welcome one of our newest contributors, author John Issitt, whose latest novel, AGENTS OF REASON, is set in the 18th century. The author will offer a free copy of Agents of Reason to a lucky blog visitor; please leave your email in the comments to be included in the . Here's the blurb:

Jeremiah was a London radical. He and his associates gave themselves to the cause - a cause that was always dangerous and compromised. This is his story. Whilst his efforts received no dividend in his lifetime today we are in his debt - we enjoy the freedoms for which he risked his life.
When the Bastille fell in 1789 English radicals like Jeremiah saw the promise of freedom but by early 1793 the French Revolution had turned into madness as Robespierre and the guillotine produced a blood bath of self destruction. In England the fear that the revolution might spread across the channel provoked reactionary responses and the years of William Pitt’s terror began. Radicals were hunted down. Some found themselves in Botany Bay, others charged with sedition or treason, languished in Newgate and the Tower.

**Q&A with John Issitt**

What led you to write Agents of Reason?

It’s been a strange journey and one I certainly didn’t plan. A number of themes and events seem to gather and project me down a path - out popped Agents of Reason. I have studied the politics of 1780- 1820 for a long time and my doctorate concerned the main hero – Jeremiah Joyce who was a political radical in London in that period so I knew a lot about him and his milieu. One of the main problems was the lack of record and there were good reasons for that – it was quite simply dangerous for radicals of the period to leave any evidence of their meetings – such evidence could see them hang or transported to Botany Bay. So all that was left were scratchings and suggestions that merely hinted at his endeavors. This was both frustrating and intriguing. It did though compel me to try to tell his story which I did in my thesis and in an academic book, but the constraints of academic history left so many gaps and failed to generate a real sense of his life and the compromises of his situation.  I needed to tell his story and recover the man.

The book seems to bridge fact and fiction. How did you decide on its style?

The questions of ‘what is an historical fact’ and ‘how far can you stray from them?’ bedevils the business of historical, if not all, writing. I had to find a mechanism that allowed me to keep as close to what is known to have happened – I use several primary sources in the text itself and I keep as tight as possible to the known sequence of events. Where I have ‘facts’ I use them but where I don’t I draw on what I know about the period and my own resources. I put myself in Jeremiah’s position and try to think through what I would have thought/done/been frightened of.  So the style is a compromise of factors. I find that most readers settle – or not - to the style after three or four pages.

Why ‘Agents’ and why ‘Reason’?

‘I came across the title because the main characters do act as agents on the direction of others – both people and forces. Jeremiah is to some extent a puppet enacting the will of more respectable intellectuals who weren’t prepared to get their hands dirty and take risks. The compromises which dictate Jeremiah’s actions are both personal and thematic and there is a strong sense in which he and his fellow radicals saw themselves as acting on behalf of a greater interest. The theme of reason reflects the classic Enlightenment claim of scientific reason as the justification for everything. Sadly, as the story shows, reason is inherently limited and insufficient in the face of human interests.

Did you enjoy the process of writing it?

By and large yes. I wrote it over four summers in my caravan – a static holiday home – in south west Scotland where I escaped from money earning endeavors for as long as I could. My caravan looks out over the sea and I watch the tide and the wind so I can go windsurfing. The light on the west coast of Scotland is delightful – you can almost taste it. I tried to write 2000 words a day from which I would normally get 800 good words the next day when I edited down and brushed the text. The final version is approximately 83,000 words but I think I must have written over 500,000 overall, had four false starts and went down a number of blind alleys. It was all a rich learning experience and felt, on balance, good.

What is your next project?


‘Tom and Edmund’ after Tom Paine and Edmund Burke. The story is structured by their parallel biographies, friendship, and then opposition. It follows their individual legacies in the realm of ideas, which set the markers for right/left democrat/republican politics. The underlying theme is reason and its fortunes in the world of human strife. 



Agents of Reason is available on Amazon as paper and ebook http://www.amazon.co.uk/Agents-Reason-John-Issitt/dp/095737710X 
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Agents-Reason-John-Issitt-ebook/dp/B00A8KW0PK

John Issitt just about to talk about Agents of Reason at Conway Hall - one London's historical centres of ethics, humanism and religious dissent.

31 October 2013

Excerpt Thursday: Agents of Reason by John Issitt

This week, we're pleased to welcome one of our newest contributors, author John Issitt, whose latest novel, AGENTS OF REASON, is set in the 18th century. Join us on Sunday, when the author will offer a free copy of Agents of Reason to a lucky blog visitor. Here's the blurb:

Jeremiah was a London radical. He and his associates gave themselves to the cause - a cause that was always dangerous and compromised. This is his story. Whilst his efforts received no dividend in his lifetime today we are in his debt - we enjoy the freedoms for which he risked his life.
When the Bastille fell in 1789 English radicals like Jeremiah saw the promise of freedom but by early 1793 the French Revolution had turned into madness as Robespierre and the guillotine produced a blood bath of self destruction. In England the fear that the revolution might spread across the channel provoked reactionary responses and the years of William Pitt’s terror began. Radicals were hunted down. Some found themselves in Botany Bay, others charged with sedition or treason, languished in Newgate and the Tower.

**An Excerpt from Agents of Reason**
Early on Monday morning Jeremiah received a letter from Earl Stanhope. All it said was:
Dear Joyce,
Please come to see me at nine on Tuesday.
Sincerely,
Stanhope
The address, Mansfield Street off Cavendish Square, was printed on the back. The Monday post had not yet arrived and the letter had probably been waiting in the front lobby of the college since Sunday night. Jeremiah knew that Kippis was currently resident in college and deduced that he and Price would have seen Stanhope over the weekend and Kippis had brought Stanhope’s letter himself.
Jeremiah stared at it. It left no room for him to say he wasn’t willing or able to come. It also presumed he would be available at a time when he would normally be in class – indicating that permission for absence had already been given.
He went to the library to think. He knew that once he met Stanhope the future course of his life would be cast, indeed the tone of this letter suggested it was already cast. The completeness of the feeling of being directed along a path he couldn’t step off suddenly hit him. He felt sick and faint at the same time. He clutched the table in an effort to steady himself. He thought of going to see Kippis to have it out with him, throw a few home truths and chastise him for assuming he would act out their plans as a mere servant to their bidding. But there seemed little gain in that. Besides, he knew that once in an argument Kippis would get the better of him and he would probably end up with his tail between his legs.
He was struck by a fear he had never encountered before. ‘Is this what men feel when they go into battle,’ he thought. ‘Is this what Christ felt when he knew his fate?’ Somehow he knew he had no choice but to comply with their plan but he also knew that he couldn’t be a mere passive player in the action. In order to cope he would have to gain some control. For the rest of the day he attended classes in body alone somehow just making his legs carry him along. He withdrew emotionally and intellectually and presented a social persona that gave nothing away.
The following morning he didn’t ask anybody’s permission or inform anybody. He left at six and walked the eight miles to Cavendish Square which he knew well having fitted panes of glass there only four years previously. He arrived early and passed time by walking the nearby streets and watching the servants coming and going taking provisions and coal into the enormous houses. He encountered a group of workmen, a couple of whom he recognised although thankfully they didn’t recognise him. It crossed his mind to speak to them and catch up on their lives but he knew they would ask what he was doing here dressed in the black of a Puritan cleric and he would probably have had to lie to get out of the situation. He moved on quickly still feeling sick.
He decided that if he was to be Stanhope’s secretary then he would enter by the front door – a thing he would never have dreamed of doing in his previous life. He knocked loudly twenty minutes early partly as a way of stating that he was not a mere lackey. A maidservant opened the door but Stanhope was standing in the entrance hall. Jeremiah presented himself with a measured coolness but was completely disarmed by Stanhope’s warmth and genuine welcome.
Stanhope was a tall thin man with a large and even thinner nose. The lines of his face all ran in a pronounced vertical direction, but a huge and very horizontal smile cut laterally across producing an implausibly large and elastic head that was instantly humorous and winning – leaving Jeremiah no option but to reciprocate and smile back.
‘Thank you for coming early. May I call you Jeremiah?’
‘Yes of course and what do I call you?’
Stanhope sensed frost in the quickness of Jeremiah’s reply yet somehow he understood and dispelled any lingering sense of Jeremiah’s resentment with another generous smile. In that second Jeremiah knew, as Stanhope did, that he would be working with him for a long time.
‘In private Charles, in company Earl. Listen, I have to be in the House shortly so can we do our business quickly?’
They entered his study which was surprisingly untidy. There were papers everywhere as well as cups and plates strewn on the furniture and even on the floor.
‘Sorry about the mess but the family and nearly all the servants are down in Chevening and I don’t let anybody in here – I am always afraid I will lose something. One of your tasks will be to keep me in better order! Will two hundred guineas a year be sufficient? You will live as one of the household. There are plenty of rooms here and at Chevening. We can give you a study and you can have use of the libraries. Is that agreeable?’
Jeremiah nodded. Two hundred a year! He would never have earnt that in four years as a painter of glass.
 ‘Right then. Ideally I would like you to start now but Price said you should start just after the new year. The family spend January in the country but we will all be here from about the 25th and I may well be here before then so we might get a chance to get to know each other without the children around. I know that Price wants to introduce you to some people and to prepare you a little for the rigours of tutoring my children.’
The slightest lift of his eyebrows suggested an anticipation that teaching his children was not going to be a particularly easy task.
‘So let’s say you will start with me on the 25th January. I look forward to working with you Jeremiah. Life is quite wild around here at times but I am sure you will enjoy it. We have a lot to do! Right then. I must get on. We can leave in-depth discussion until you arrive.’
He disappeared. The servant was nowhere to be seen so Jeremiah let himself out. It was now only a little past nine o’clock so he delayed going back to the college and went to tell Joshua what had gone on. A feeling of euphoria came upon him as he walked down to the Strand. He could look forward to a considerable income and a mission in the service of the Lord. ‘What more could I possibly want?’ he asked himself.



Agents of Reason is available on Amazon as paper and ebook http://www.amazon.co.uk/Agents-Reason-John-Issitt/dp/095737710X 
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Agents-Reason-John-Issitt-ebook/dp/B00A8KW0PK

John Issitt just about to talk about Agents of Reason at Conway Hall - one London's historical centres of ethics, humanism and religious dissent.

20 September 2013

New & Noteworthy: September 20

Blythe Gifford’s next two books for the Harlequin Historical line are Royal Wedding stories, set amidst the drama and intrigue of the medieval court of King Edward III of England. SECRETS AT COURT will be released in March, 2014 and WHISPERS AT COURT is scheduled later in the year.

John Isitt is presenting a talk at Conway Hall in Red Lion Square, Holborn (London, UK) on Sunday October 6th, about the writing of his book Agents of Reason. See the Conway Hall website for more information.

Kim Rendfeld's The Cross and the Dragon was rated Un-Put-Down-Able by Bookwork Brandee (full review here). Next week (Sept. 24-25), she is scheduled to be at Novel Pastimes for an interview and giveaway.

10 September 2013

The End of an Era: Meaning & Solace in Pre-Christian Society

The search for meaning and solace in the dangerous world before the birth of Christ


Conditions of life until the 20th century were pretty raw and sadly, they continue to be so for many people. Fighting, pestilence, lack of food and the abuses of others were the conditions most people were born into. If you were lucky and strong enough to survive childhood you could count your blessing. Then the perils of childbirth for women and the demands of war for men, were just two of the imminent dangers that brought mortality to front of your mind. Unless you were very lucky, living into your fifth decade was unlikely.

In the face of such hardship we could easily be tempted into Thomas Hobbes’s famous dictum ‘life is nasty, brutish and short’. But people, by and large, can’t live with such meaningless pessimism. They look for, ache for, solace and a feeling of belonging to something that orientates their life. Whether it is fate, the play of the Gods or the spirits of nature, people need to locate themselves in relation to their experience. Our logic-orientated brains have sought reasons – some kind of rational account of what, why and how.

The story of reason that we in the Christian west tell ourselves is that from around the 5th century BC from the pre-Socratics and then the trio of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, reason was born in ancient Greece from which the civilized world emerged. Despite serious omissions in the story (for example China, India and Persia) this lineage interlaced with more ancient scriptural accounts is the one we imbibe through our culture and is traced through the history of philosophy and ideas taught in our universities. Very, very crudely, reason passes through Rome, onwards through Christ, gets lost in the ‘Dark Ages’ emerges in the Renaissance, gets reworked through the Reformation, Descartes and Newton before arriving at the ages of Enlightenment, Revolution and Modernity. Phew!

The story of reason demands a lifetime of scholarship but reason itself is also severely limited in helping us deal with life. Reason alone never delivers what the human spirit needs and as Mahatma Gandhi famously put it ‘Reason given the status of omnipotence becomes a monster.’ In the centuries between Socrates and Christ, reason was worked and used in three of our most enduring philosophies. Again very, very crudely: Scepticism – the belief that real knowledge of things is impossible, Epicureanism – that the world is made of the mere fortuitous combination of atoms, and Stoicism – that happiness can only be obtained by submission to natural law.

All three are components of the intellectual resources we operate with today – you can find them in the everyday talk of folk. But can you see how they each attempt to deliver a reasoned account of the human condition, but are each insufficient in helping us to live our lives. They are at best partial accounts and do not answer our internal ache to find meaning. As people in the centuries before Christ and Christendom faced their hardships, such philosophies would not have helped them much.

The intellectual conditions before Christ lacked what the Christ story provided – a way of finding meaning in adverse conditions. Maybe that is why Christianity took such an enduring grip on us.

John Issitt is the author of Agents of Reason.
Website: http://www.agentsofreason.co.uk/,
Goodreads: http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/3175872.John_Issitt
Friend on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/john.issitt.10
Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Issittjohn



29 July 2013

Meet our Contributors: John Issitt

Agents of Reason

John Issitt

I wrote Agents of Reason over four Scottish summers whilst escaping my then day job as a Provost in the University of York. I owe it and its hero Jeremiah Joyce a debt. Since its publication I have realized that writing is my vocation. I have taken the risky step of becoming a full-time writer. I swing from the thrill of new beginnings to the fear of having no money to fix the boiler!

Agents of Reason grew from my historical research and my frustrations with academia. My doctorate concerned Jeremiah who was a political radical and religious dissenter in London over the period of the French Revolution. The western world was rearranged by the events in France. At first it was welcomed by the metropolitan intelligentsia who saw it as feeding their own causes. But such support rapidly evaporated as Robespierre and then Napoleon led it to self destruction and war. Jeremiah lived through these times and was part of the movement that attempted to secure political representation for ordinary people independent of religious persuasion. He failed in his lifetime as did his collaborator Tom Paine, but over the longer term his efforts contributed to the march of freedom. Today we enjoy rights he fought for and on those grounds alone his story is worth telling.

But therein lies the difficulty. To tell his story simply through the archival record is impossible for a number of reasons. The first concerns the limited surviving archive. Records of radicals and radical publications were dangerous – they provided evidence to used in law. Most radical goings-on were conducted by word of mouth - records were minimal and normally destroyed. Only scratchings remain. Also, over time most radicals became deeply embarrassed about their former enthusiasm and destroyed their letters. Jeremiah burnt his and the same happened to the records of his employer – the Earl of Stanhope.

The second reason or set of reasons, is to do with how history has been written. Academic history attempts to provide an objective account from evidence – impossible if there isn’t much. The records that survive are mainly those of the official world – the papers of government, the prime minister and the aristocracy. Furthermore, most academic history has little feel for the life of a common man like Jeremiah. Such history reflects the winners and tells the story through the lens of the great and the good – not through the experience of men like Jeremiah. As a result there are many silences – the voices of the lower orders, of women and of the different, who were actually no less important in the action, are rarely heard.

I came to academia late after working in a range of physical employments – timber cutting, building and technical jobs in the film industry. Like Jeremiah I had worked with my hands, knew the difficulties of unemployment and demanding working conditions. I entered academia as a stranger to the values it operates and I remain estranged from a world which seems at the same time a wonderful opportunity to think, but ludicrously constrained by conventions it is largely unable to recognise. 

One such constraint is the demand to write in a particular way. My doctorate, numerous papers in learned journals and a book on Jeremiah’s life and writings. were written within the limiting conventions of academic history which I felt never let me get close enough to Jeremiah the man. The license for interpretation of the motivations of the common man is small and has, if you are to be published, to be aligned within academic rules that debar the fictional. The result is that it is impossible to capture the textures of a life lived.

Agents of Reason comes from negotiating and hopefully resolving some of these factors – at least to the best of my ability. I have tried to put my head into Jeremiah’s world armed with 20 years of study and half a century of life. I have used the archive but not been afraid to fictionalize when the story demanded. How well I have done is for the reader to judge.

Agents of Reason is a story of political intrigue set in late Enlightenment England and what has come to be known as Prime Minister Pitt’s ‘terror years’ due to his system of spies and prosecution of radicals. But it is also a story that navigates the tensions of the human condition. Jeremiah was subject - he was selected, used and abused by authorities not wishing to get their own hands dirty. But he was also an agent - he chose and part directed his course of action. Within and by such contradictory tensions Jeremiah was tested – for his integrity and his resolve. He gave a good account of himself. I wonder how I would have got on?

Learn more about our newest contributor John Issitt at:
Website: http://www.agentsofreason.co.uk/
Goodreads: http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/3175872.John_Issitt
Friend on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/john.issitt.10
Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Issittjohn