Showing posts with label HEA or Not. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HEA or Not. Show all posts

30 June 2014

Happily Ever After (or Not): Drusus Germanicus and Antonia Minor

by Heather Domin

You don’t see a lot of epic romances in Roman history – partnerships, sure, passions, affairs, a few obsessions here and there, but not many great true-love matches. The tendency toward political and arranged marriages among the upper classes did not give much consideration to marital love (hence the affairs). But there were exceptions of course, and for me one of the greatest and most bittersweet is the short marriage of Claudius Drusus, aka Drusus the Elder or Drusus Germanicus, and Antonia Minor.

one of the few likenesses
of Drusus the Elder
Drusus was the son of Augustus’ wife Livia from her first marriage, raised from the age of five in his stepfather’s house along with his brother Tiberius. Augustus and Livia never had children of their own, but the boys didn’t lack company; Augustus ran a veritable boarding school of children belonging to his family, friends, and enemies, including barbarian princes. Among the motley brood was Antonia Minor, a daughter of Marc Antony from his marriage to Augustus’ sister Octavia. After her father abandoned them, she and her siblings were raised by their mother as part of Augustus’ family.

the Juno Ludovisi,
modeled after Antonia
Antonia was only two years younger than Drusus, so they most likely grew up together as playmates. It’s romantic to imagine them falling in love at a young age, engaging in adolescent flirtation among the colonnades, but there’s no direct evidence for this. What we do know is that Augustus had great things planned for Drusus, his favorite stepson; and one of them was a match with Antonia, his favorite niece, a marriage to which both parties readily agreed.

They married in 16BC when he was 22 and she was 20, and for the next seven years they were one of the foremost power couples in Rome. He was a famous general, handsome and dashing, destined for greatness and possibly the throne; she was beautiful and vivacious, clever and independent, exercising a level of freedom unusual for women of the time. Augustus had no qualms about rearranging family marriages as often as the furniture, but he never meddled with Drusus and Antonia’s union. They had three children who lived to maturity, and possibly two others who did not. From all accounts they were deeply in love; there is no evidence that either of them ever had affairs or took lovers, which was pretty unheard of in elite Roman society.

But their marriage was destined to be brief. In 9 BC, Drusus died after a freak accident at the age of just 29. Although she was only 27, Antonia never remarried, instead focusing her energy into becoming one of the most powerful women Rome had ever known. As a matriarch of the Julio-Claudian dynasty she advised her children and grandchildren as they rose and fell from power, and she could be brutal when they did not live up to her expectations. She lived to the age of 73, when in one last act of authority she committed suicide as a protest against the antics of her grandson Caligula.

Antonia’s image as a cold and callous woman who rejected her son Claudius and executed her own daughter is not entirely false, though it’s probably colored by historical misogyny; but I can’t help wondering how different her life might have been if she hadn’t lost Drusus at such a young age. No matter what she became later in life, for a brief time Antonia and Drusus shared one of the great love stories of the Augustan era.



Heather Domin writes mixed-genre fiction including historical adventure, unconventional romance, and supernatural suspense. She is preparing to publish Valerian's Legion: The Heirs of Fortune later this summer, in which Drusus Germanicus plays a major role.

18 June 2014

HEA or Not: Urraca of León-Castile and Alfonso I of Aragón

By Jessica Knauss


A Marriage That Sparked Rebellion, Sieges, and Battles


She was the Queen of Castile. He was the King of Aragón. Their marriage could unite two dynasties and create the most powerful kingdom in Western Europe…

You might think I’m referring to the 1479 union of Isabel and Fernando, the Reyes Católicos, one of the most successful monarchical couples in history (and profiled beautifully here). But this Queen of Castile and King of Aragón were married 370 years before Isabel and Fernando. The marriage of Urraca of León and Castile and Alfonso I of Aragón was an experiment in nation-building that failed miserably, perhaps to pave the way for the later success of the Reyes Católicos.

Statue of Urraca in the Parque del Buen Retiro
(Photo by Jessica Knauss)
Before this explosive marriage, Urraca had already been a child bride, given birth to the boy who would be Alfonso VII, and become Queen of León and Castile. She married her first husband at the age of eight. Historical evidence suggests that the marriage was consummated when she was all of thirteen. She had no time for naïveté, and by the time her first husband died and she was on the marriage market again, she was 26 and ready to assert all the command granted by her position. In Aragón, women were not allowed to become queen, but in Castile, Urraca had always known ultimate earthly power as her birthright. Regardless, her authority became jeopardized during the life of her father, who named her brother his heir and opened up the possibility of his illegitimate children, including his daughter Teresa, sharing the fractured kingdom with the legitimate ones. Her father unwittingly trained Urraca in strategy and the willingness to fight for her rights.

Statue of Alfonso I of Aragón in Zaragoza
(WikiMedia Commons)
Alfonso I of Aragón, known as “the Warrior,” proved the validity of his nickname in battle and also in this marriage. He was well over 30 when the nuptial negotiations began and had been the King of Aragon for five years when the wedding took place. His agenda revolved around the taking and keeping of cities and power, occupations in which women did not play a role. Alfonso’s inured bachelor ways left him unprepared for Urraca’s refusal to play a subordinate role to his imperial ambitions.

The fireworks began when Urraca’s father came up with the mere idea of getting Urraca and Alfonso I together. In spite of the obvious advantages such a union would have against the Almoravid threat from the south, many local nobles feared the eastward shift in power. They were also anxious to unite their own families with the Castilian royal line. The marriage negotiations, which took place over the protests of Castilian and French nobles in addition to Urraca herself, became protracted beyond the death of Urraca’s father. Once Urraca was Queen, any new marriage could disenfranchise her ability to assure her children’s inheritance. Pure enjoyment of the privileges of widowhood may have been her chief reservation about Alfonso I.

Swayed by a sense of duty to her father’s wishes, Urraca married Alfonso in 1109 at the castle of Monzón de Campos. Alfonso wasted no time in titling himself Emperor of Spain and naming his Aragonese nobles to high positions all over the Christian part of the Iberian Peninsula. The Galician nobles declared a rebellion when they insisted Urraca’s son was the rightful inheritor to their kingdom. Alfonso responded with military action and established control against Galician troops at Monterroso Castle in 1110.

This military action was only a prelude to the unrest and all-out civil war the marriage would provoke for the next few years. It seems that Urraca and Alfonso had an explosive case of negative chemistry. Two factions developed at court, each one in support of one spouse against the other. Urraca quickly achieved an annulment from Pope Paschal II on the basis that she and Alfonso were second cousins. She also cited abuses, tyranny, removing bishops from their dioceses and planning the death of her son. Urraca had already put some geographical distance between herself and Alfonso, but he refused to accept the annulment. When he learned that she had been carrying on an affair with Gómez González, an important count at her court, Alfonso had Urraca imprisoned and used all his military might to take over as many cities that supported her as he could, deposing more bishops and archbishops as he went.

Urraca as Queen
(WikiMedia Commons)
Gómez González, with the help of the Queen’s supporters, freed her from Alfonso’s prison and took her to Candespina, where they thought she would be safe. Alfonso could not allow such an affront to his power. In October 1111, with support from Urraca’s illegitimate half-sister Teresa, he won the Battle of Candespina, which Gómez González did not survive.

The emotional blow of losing her lover did no harm to Urraca’s strategic thinking. Teresa attempted to use the victory as a bargaining chip, but Urraca hated her more than she hated Alfonso. She agreed to reconcile with her husband as long as he forced Teresa to stay within her own lands in Galicia.

With disregard for Alfonso’s wishes, Urraca then proceeded to proclaim her son from her first marriage King of Galicia. The entire year of 1112 was a succession of confrontation and reconciliation in words and deeds, including the battles of Astorga and Carrión de los Condes. In 1113, the Queen besieged Burgos, the most Castilian of cities. Although his military prowess could have won the city for Alfonso, he understood that with only the support of his Aragonese and Navarrese nobles, he wouldn’t be able to make this empire work in any practical way. He finally accepted the annulment in 1114, making it official at a council in Palencia and returning to Aragón.

Urraca's royal signature
Urraca never married again, preferring to keep the company of powerful men without being under their thumbs. The union of Castile and Aragón would have to wait for a different kind of spark.


The definitive work in English about Urraca’s reign is Bernard F. Reilly’s The Kingdom of León-Castilla under Queen Urraca, 1109–1126.

A driven fiction writer, Jessica Knauss has edited many fine historical novels. Find out more about her historical novel, Seven Noble Knights, and her other writing and bookish activities here. Follow her on Facebook and Twitter, too!


17 June 2014

HEA or Not x 5: Charlemagne’s Marriages


One thing I did not make up in my historical novels is Charlemagne’s complicated family life and how his personal decisions had consequences for his kingdom in the eighth and ninth centuries. Charles was married five times, and politics influenced his choices.

Wife No. 1, Himiltrude: Some scholars believe the contemporary sources that say Himiltrude, mother of Charles’s eldest son Pepin, was a concubine. But I’m going to believe Pope Stephen, who cited the fact that Charles and his younger brother, Carloman, were already married on their father’s order as a reason not to wed a Lombard princess, the daughter of the pope’s enemy.

For one thing, Charles’s son was named after his paternal grandfather. Parents chose names with a purpose in mind, not out of sentiment or a whim. Besides, it would make no sense for King Pepin to order the younger son to be married and not the other. No one disputed that Gerberga was Carloman’s widow.

Charlemagne coin (Karl-i-money) A coin with
Charles’s image, minted around 812.
When King Pepin died in 768, Charles was 20 and likely was a teenager when he married Himiltrude. We don’t know much about her, other than that she was a Frank. Charles set her aside to marry the Lombard princess. Himiltrude might have wound up in the royal abbey of Nivelles after the divorce, and one academic paper has presented the tantalizing possibility that the scorned ex-wife might have played a role in her son’s attempt to overthrow his father years later.

Wife No. 2, the Lombard princess: Even her name is lost to us. Because of a misreading of a medieval book, she has been called Desiderata, but her name might have been Gerperga. She was a daughter of Lombard King Desiderius and Queen Ansa, and her marriage to Charles was part of a complicated plan to build an alliance and Queen Mother Bertrada’s efforts to keep peace between Charles and Carloman, who each inherited a kingdom when their father died. For the most part, the peace and the alliance held, but it fell apart when Carloman died of an illness and Charles seized his late brother’s lands. Charles set Gerperga aside to marry a girl from an important family in Carloman’s former kingdom.

Wife No. 3, Hildegard: The Swabian might have been 12 or 13, an age the Franks considered marriageable, when she became queen. She was marrying a robust young man in 20s rather than someone much older, but did she have any trepidation about how he had treated his first two wives? The Frankish sources are silent.

Hildegard image – 16th century
drawing of Hildegard
During their approximately 11-year marriage, Charles was a steadfast husband. Hildegard bore nine children, six of whom survived infancy. Two of her sons, Louis and Pepin (the latter originally named Carloman and yes, Charles had two sons named Pepin), became subkings of Aquitaine and Italy, and her eldest son, Charles (called Karl in my novels), stood to inherit the rest. We don’t know what caused her death in 783, but it happened shortly after the birth of her ninth child, a girl who lived only 40 days. In addition to commissioning an epitaph for his queen, Charles gave land to the Church and financed daily Masses on behalf of her soul. She is entombed at St. Arnulf in Metz, and candles were burned on the anniversary of her death.

Wife No. 4, Fastrada (the heroine of my work in progress): A few months after Hildegard’s death, Charles made another political marriage, this one to a noblewoman whose family was east of the Rhine. He needed that alliance as the war with Saxony to the east and north continued. Charles might have fathered a child between his marriages to Hildegard and Fastrada, but he was a steadfast husband to his fourth wife. Despite a possible 20-year age difference, they seemed fond of each other.

When authors of the Royal Frankish Annals usually did not trouble themselves with how a couple felt about their reunion after months apart, the 787 entry says that Charles and Fastrada “rejoiced over each other and were happy together and praised God’s mercy.”

In a letter from Charles to Fastrada, composed before he went to war with the Avars in 791, he greets her as “our beloved and most loving wife.” After filling her in on the litanies to ensure God’s favor and asking her to make sure the ritual is carried out at home, Charles says he is surprised he hasn’t heard from her lately. “As to which, it is our desire that you should notify us more frequently concerning your health and other matters.”

A crisis arose in their family and the kingdom in 792 when Charles’s eldest son, Pepin (also known as Pepin the Hunchback), was involved in a plot to overthrow his father. When caught, the conspirators blame the cruelty of Queen Fastrada. Written years after her and Charles’s deaths, neither author who cited her supposed cruelty specified what she did, which leads me to believe she was a scapegoat.

When she died in 794, Charles had her buried with the honors due a queen. At Mainz, she was interred in a crypt in front of the altar of the apostles. Charles commissioned an epitaph, gave land to St. Alban, and paid for Masses on behalf of her soul.

Charles and Pepin – 10th century
copy of a ninth century illustration
Wife No. 5, Liutgard: When Fastrada died, Charles’s heirs, the three sons he had with Hildegard, were young men, and each expected to inherit a kingdom. (His son with Himiltrude was imprisoned in a monastery.) With a family history of civil wars over who would get to rule, it’s possible Charles did not want any more claimants to the throne. He might have been ecstatic that Fastrada bore only two girls. He adored his daughters and relied on them.

Charles might have dated Liutgard for two years before marrying her, which makes me suspect he wanted a woman who couldn’t have kids. If that’s the case, he got his wish. Their six-year marriage did not produce any children. The poet Theodulf praised her for her beauty and grace: “Open-handed, gentle spirited, sweet in words, she is ready to help all and obstruct none. She labors hard and well at her study and learning, and retains the noble disciplines in her memory.” 

Liutgard died of an illness in Tours in 800 and is buried there. Charles was 52.

Perhaps intent on limiting his successors to three, Charles did not marry again, and in 806, divided his kingdom among Young Charles, Pepin, and Louis. At age 58 – old by medieval standards – Charles introduced stability into his kingdom.

However, Charles was not celibate. Between 800 and his death in 814, he fathered five more children by four concubines. I can see you all rolling your eyes - an aging man trying to prove he’s still got it. Well, yes, but the reason is not only male vanity. Even here, politics plays a role. Virility was proof of Charles’s physical perfection and his fitness to rule.

Sources

Einhard’s The Life of Charlemagne, translated by Evelyn Scherabon Firchow and Edwin H.
Zeydel

Carolingian Chronicles, which includes the Royal Frankish Annals and Nithard’s Histories, translated by
Bernard Walter Scholz with Barbara Rogers

Charlemagne: Translated Sources, P.D. King

“Making a Difference in Eighth-Century Politics: The Daughters of Desiderius,” Janet L. Nelson, After Rome's Fall: Narrators and Sources of Early Medieval History

Poetry of the Carolingian Renaissance, edited by Peter Godman

Courts, Elites, and Gendered Power in the Early Middle Ages: Charlemagne and Others, Janet L. Nelson

Hildegard is Charles’s queen and a minor character in Kim Rendfeld’s two published novels, The Cross and the Dragon (2012, Fireship Press) and The Ashes of Heaven’s Pillar (August 28, 2014, Fireship Press). Kim is working on her third novel, which features Queen Fastrada. For more about Kim, visit kimrendfeld.com, her blog Outtakes of a Historical Novelist at kimrendfeld.wordpress.com, like her on Facebook at facebook.com/authorkimrendfeld, follow her on Twitter at @kimrendfeld, or contact her at kim [at] kimrendfeld [dot] com.

09 June 2014

HEA or Not: William and Honora Fortescue

 By Mark Bois

In 1798, Ensign William Faithful Fortescue married Honora Marie O’Brian in a ceremony conducted by the local Catholic priest.  In is interesting to consider the notion that their seemingly innocent marriage was a small but deliberate violation of the law.
William was a junior officer of the Westmeath Militia. His company had been posted to Clonakilty, Ireland, and it was there that he met Honora, a daughter of one of the premier Irish clans. Historical sources being what they are, there is no record of how they met, though we might be sentimental enough to assume they came to love one another. What the record does show is that they were married in the spring of that year, and that just months later William and every other crown soldier in Ireland was fighting for his life against thousands of the Irish people in the largest rebellion of Ireland’s long, tormented history.
For hundreds of years Ireland had been harshly ruled by the English. Ninety-five percent of the land was controlled by five percent of the population, the small, selfish, and corrupt oligarchy of Anglo-Irish Protestant elites. The native Irish had been reduced to the status of disenfranchised tenants. The English solidified their dominance with harsh Penal Laws intended to keep the natives powerless, and to reduce the power of the Catholic Church.
Penal Laws touched every aspect of Irish society, but one was particularly pertinent to Ensign Fortescue and Miss O’Brian. A 1745 law decreed that a marriage of a Protestant and a Catholic, if conducted by a Catholic priest, was null and void.  That law was well known throughout Ireland, and yet the young couple knowingly violated it. William was a King’s officer, and one wonders why he would risk censure from those of his religion and class to marry a Catholic woman, by a Catholic priest.  One possible explanation is of a romantic nature: perhaps he did so to prove his love to his Catholic fiancé.
William proved his loved to Honora, and he then had opportunity to prove his loyalty to his King in action against the Irish rebels at the battle of Shannonvale, then as the years passed he served as an officer with the 27th Foot, the Inniskilling Regiment. He served with distinction in the Peninsula, in America, and at Waterloo.
At Waterloo the Inniskillings took more casualties than any other unit on the field, yet they unflinchingly held their position at a key point of the Allied line. William was one of the wounded, shot through the arm and chest. Such a wound was almost always fatal, but he miraculously recovered. But the wound never fully healed, and he eventually developed a degenerative lung condition. He died a lingering, gasping death six years later, Honora would later write, “literally for want of air.”
Honora quickly applied for a pension, in a letter so desperate and poignant as to merit being quoted in full:

Received.  July 3, 1821
 
To the Secretary of War                                                     Clonakilty, Ireland
War Office
Sir,                                                                                         
I am the unfortunate widow of William Faithful Fortescue, late of the 3rd Veteran Battalion, and of the 27th Regiment of Foot, I was Married to him in the year of the Rebellion, when he served in the Westmeath Militia, and I Flatter myself with Credit to himself and his affectionate Family; he served on the Peninsula and was in many Actions, he went with the 27th Regiment to the plains of Waterloo, where he received two Wounds one in the arm one the other in his Chest and was for many months Despaired of, his health he never recovered, but as he was so near getting his Company and promotion, he ran all risques and went out with the regiment to Gibraltar where he remained for more than a year in a wretched state of health until his Colonel wrote to his family to beg they should pressure on him to exchange into A Veteran Battalion which he did, after his Misery and Twenty Years servitude, to put an end to my sad story he departed this life at Mallow on the 22nd of the month after suffering more than words can tell, and Leaving his wife and Five Children three daughters and two Sons, with no other provision but their Claim on Government.  I shall no longer Trespass on your time, but to request you would favor me with a few lines to let me know, to whom I am to send my Certificates and what steps to follow it I am to take, my two Sons are at School at Mr. Dempster Barron House Surrey, and my youngest Daughter at Falkham near London, my two eldest at Malahides near Dublin, they have lost the best of Fathers who was endeavoring to give them a good education as the Children of A Gentleman of Birth and excellent private and public Character, and once more to Request Sir you will favor me with a Speedy Answer-  
I have the Honour to be Sir your most Obedient
                                                                                             Honora M. Fortescue
The Names and Ages of my Children
Susan C. Fortescue Born at Naas Age 19
Honoria Fortescue Born at London Derry Age 17
John C. Clermont Fortescue Born at Tullemore Age 15
William T. Neynoe Fortescue born at Enniskillen Age 13-
and Mary Anne Born in Clonakilty Age 8 going on Nine

 But desperation and poignancy had little effect on Dublin Castle. As William had been posted to a Veteran’s Battalion just before his death, his pension lay with the Castle. Their authorization of the pension was inexplicably delayed, then delayed again, until Honora was forced to beg for help from British army headquarter at Horse Guards.
            Lord Palmerston, Secretary for War, who was also bombarded with letters of support from William’s brother officers, was blunt in telling the Castle to pay the pension. But the Fortescues’ secret had somehow been uncovered. The Castle replied to Palmerston with an acidly polite letter to point out “that the late Lieutenant Fortescue was a Protestant, and Mrs. Fortescue a Roman Catholic. It may be proper to observe, that one of the parties having been a Protestant, the other a Protestant or Roman Catholic, the marriage, as now certified, is not by law valid- A marriage of persons so circumstanced by a Roman Catholic Priest, was once a felony, and is still highly penal, unless the parties were previously married by a Protestant Clergyman.”
            In the face of the stubborn resistance of Dublin Castle, Horse Guards paid the pension themselves. Signed by Lord Palmerston, the pension was backdated to 22 June 1821, and was increased from the mandated £26 to £40 per annum. But by then it was too late; Honora Fortescue had also died, without knowing if her children would be cared for.  We cannot know how that uncertainty shaped her final days. Her youngest daughter, Mary Anne, also died, just days after her mother, at school in England. The second daughter, Honoria, at age seventeen, carried on her mother’s work and inquired about the pension on behalf of her siblings. The records close with yet another obfuscating official letter from the Castle, confusing Honoria with her late mother Honora.
            Reform of the Penal Laws came slowly. Faced with the prospect of civil war in Ireland, Parliament eventually passed an Emancipation Bill in 1829 which removed some barriers, but only over violent protest from Dublin Castle. A Marriage Law removed some restrictions in 1836, though it was not until 1873 that all legal barriers to Catholic marriage were removed.
While those legal barriers were removed, social barriers remained. All across the world, and to our collective shame, humanity’s tradition, bias, and fear, restrict what should be a simple matter of recognizing the love two people hold for one another.  
Reform came far too late for William and Honora Fortescue. They must have been anguished to die, knowing they left a cloud of doubt, perhaps even shame, over their family’s future. We might hope, though, they would have been pleased to know that things worked out well for their four surviving children.  The scattered records reflect both the older girls marrying well, while both boys secured commissions in the service of the East India Company. 
The lives of the Fortescues are buried in the endless rolling history of the world. The story of their struggle is reduced to one thin, dusty envelope in the British National Archives. Still, those of a trusting nature might think that William and Honora found peace.  Those of a particularly sentimental nature might hope they love one another yet.

Mark Bois is a guest contributor this month at Unusual Historicals. This is his first article.

Born in Chicago and raised in Kansas City, Mark Bois is of Belgian and Irish ancestry. It is perhaps natural, then, that he would develop a fascination with the First Battalion of the 27th Foot, an Irish regiment, at the Battle of Waterloo.  He would eventually return to school to earn a Master’s degree in history, writing his thesis on the Inniskilling Regiment in 1815.

Amongst the dusty rosters and letters in the British National Archives, and then in the artifacts and records of the Inniskilling Regimental Museum, he found what he needed to write his thesis, but he also discovered the fascinating personal stories that provided the basis for his novel Lieutenant and Mrs. Lockwood. Many actual experiences of the men and officers of the 27th Foot were pulled from those sources to be used in the novel.

                                                                        

02 June 2014

HEA or Not: The Nation Builders, Fernando of Aragón and Isabel of Castile

By Lisa J. Yarde

Queen Isabel's portrait at Segovia's Alcazar
On October 18, 1469 at Valladolid in the northern Iberian Peninsula, a wedding occurred. By all accounts, the bride was a fair-faced beauty at almost nineteen with reddish-gold hair, who had earned the admiration of many for her appearance and religious piety. Most judged the groom, just under a year younger, as equally attractive, chivalrous, and intelligent. Bride and groom shared proud bloodlines dating from the 14th century Duke of Lancaster John of Gaunt, a younger brother of Edward, the Black Prince. Of all who might have thought the couple well-suited, the bride perhaps held the highest hopes for the union with her would-be husband. Suitors had come and gone from Portugal and France, most of them disagreeable in her view for their avarice and dubious intentions. Fernando, the son of John II of Aragón would inherit the second largest kingdom in the peninsula and already held Sicily in his own right. For Isabel, a princess of Castile who had emerged in recent years as the presumed heir to her brother Enrique IV, no one but Fernando would do as a choice for her husband.

Sounds like a fairytale match destined to end happily ever after, but pragmatism governed decisions in the marriage between Fernando of Aragón and Isabel of Castile. In the Pact of the Toros de Guisando negotiated a year before the union, Enrique IV withdrew his long-held declaration that his daughter the Infanta Juana (whom many believed to be the child of another man) would be Castile's heir. With his queen in disgrace, pregnant by another man, and his younger half-brother the Infante Alfonso dead of a sudden illness, Isabel emerged as the best candidate in the succession. The Pact required her marriage, but she rejected her brother's choice and selected Fernando. He traveled to Castile under escort while Isabel wrote her brother of her intent to marry, despite his personal opposition to the interference of Aragón in Castile's political future. Isabel and Fernando met at Valladolid. They had a prenuptial agreement requiring each to support the other in the defense of their individual realms, but the terms made it clear; Isabel expected to remain in control of Castile without her husband's meddling. A fake dispensation from the papal court alleviated claims that their blood ties should prevent the marriage, a situation Isabel abhorred and ensured she had rectified some years later by a real papal bull issued from Pope Sixtus IV.
Painting of Isabel's crowning

Since the union occurred without the approval of Enrique IV, he judged the terms of the Pact as voided and refused to uphold Isabel's rights to succession. Instability followed, which even the death of Enrique IV on December 11, 1474, did not resolve. When her brother's demise occurred, Isabella was in Segovia and rushed to claim the throne of Castile. Back in Aragón, Fernando heard the news and returned to assert his right as king; since he and his wife had independent interests, he might have held some concern over Isabel's failure to wait to claim her rights through her husband. The Portuguese monarch backed the claim of Isabel's niece Juana (who was also his niece through her mother), whom he married. Another five years would pass before Pope Sixtus IV annulled Juana's marriage to her maternal uncle and invalidated her claim to Castile.

Isabel and Fernando had five daughters and one son. During this time, she also endured her husband's adulterous behavior, the proof being children born in subsequent years after their wedding. Fernando named his illegitimate son an archbishop. Despite these affairs, the mutual interests of Isabel and Fernando prevailed. They established the Inquisition to root out so-called heretics, rid the country of its last Moorish rulers, and maintained a highly effective rule over their respective kingdoms. While their son died before his parents, their daughter Juana inherited the unified crowns of Castile and Aragón.            

Fernando and Isabel's relationship as dramatized in the Spanish TV series, Isabel

Sources
History of the reign of Ferdinand and Isabella, volume 1, by William Hickling Prescott

Spain: the Root and the Flower by John A. Crow

A History of Medieval Spain by Joseph O'Callaghan

Spain's Centuries of Crisis: 1300-1474 by Teofilo F. Ruiz 

All images are mine, taken during visits to Spain.

Lisa J. Yarde writes fiction inspired by the Middle Ages in Europe. She is the author of two historical novels set in medieval England and Normandy, The Burning Candle, based on the life of one of the first countesses of Leicester and Surrey, Isabel de Vermandois, and On Falcon's Wings, chronicling the star-crossed romance between Norman and Saxon lovers before the Battle of Hastings. Lisa has also written four novels in a six-part series set in Moorish Spain, Sultana, Sultana’s Legacy, Sultana: Two Sisters, and Sultana: The Bride Price where rivalries and ambitions threaten the fragile bonds between members of a powerful family. Her short story, The Legend Rises, which chronicles the Welsh princess Gwenllian of Gwynedd’s valiant fight against English invaders, is also available.