16 February 2010

Love Affairs: Katherine Swynford & John of Gaunt

By Blythe Gifford

Any of you who have seen me post here, or elsewhere on the web, will not be surprised at my choice of romantic couples. Katherine Swynford and John of Gaunt, son of King Edward III of England, are hands down, my favorite lovers of all time.

Immortalized in Anya Seton's KATHERINE, their story is an amazing true tale of long time lovers who came to their happy ending late in life.

John, Duke of Lancaster, was, as Alison Weir writes, "the greatest English nobleman of his time"--chivalrous, rich, politically astute, a great warrior, tall, lean, and handsome. What's more, it's reported that 300 years later, a codpiece reportedly made for him was on display in the Tower of London and "better worth a lewd lady's admiration than any piece of antiquity in the Tower." (Alas, Wier goes on to expose this as the 18th century equivalent of an urban legend.)

Katherine Swynford, on the other hand, was daughter of a knight (Paon de Roet) and would have sunk into obscurity had it not been for the patronage of Edward's queen, Phillipa. She obtained this because her father was from the queen's home country of Hainault and who served her in England for many years.

We have little official evidence of Katherine. No letters and few documents remain, not even her will. What does emerge from the record, however, is almost universally flattering. She was beautiful, educated, pious, and comfortable at the highest levels of court.

In addition, she served as mother or surrogate mother to a blended family of more than ten children. They included three to four of her own (by her first husband), three to four of John's children (by his first and second wives), as well as the four they had together. And she seems to have successfully created an atmosphere that allowed these pseudo-siblings to become fast friends for life.

Any modern day mother must stand in awe of her for this accomplishment alone.

As a side note, Katherine's sister was married to Geoffrey Chaucer, the pre-eminent writer of the 14th century. This has sparked a game of "find Katherine" among some scholars, for he must have known his sister in law well. The picture here, excerpted from the frontpiece of Chaucer's TROILUS, has been identified as Katherine, probably late in life, after her marriage to the Duke. If accurate, she seems to have had golden hair, a slim figure, and a fashionably high forehead, even at that age.

At the time the two began their affair, Katherine had already served as governess to John's children with his first, and much beloved wife, Blanche. (Blanche was a paragon herself. Rich, beautiful, educated, it seems she and John also had a love match.)

Katherine, 22, was a widow with at least three children. John, a widower ten years older than she, had just married Constance of Spain, a political marriage and never a truly happy one.

Initially, the lovers were discreet. John may not have loved his new wife, but she was the key to his goal of assuming the throne of Castile. During their affair, Katherine bore him four children, the Beauforts (see my previous post), but largely stayed away from court (and the attention of the chroniclers) for many years.

Among the touching evidence that has come down to us from John's household records are regular gifts to "our very dear and well-beloved Dame Katherine de Swynford." Among these are oak trees "suitable for building." This sounds less than romantic to modern ears, but they were cut from forests he owned and used for improvements to her home, Kettlethorpe, where their children were raised.

Of course, all was not bliss. They were regularly apart as John was at court or fighting on the continent. Yet finally, around 1377 or 1378, he seems to have relinquished some of the pretense and Katherine was more and more seen at his side. This did not go unnoticed, and Katherine is called his "unspeakable concubine" by the chroniclers. But despite this, they also note, an unusual and telling entry, that she loved the Duke and their children. (This is a far cry from their description of his father's mistress, Alice Perrers.)

John's father had now died, and John was uncle to the new king, Richard II. It was a time of unrest, and when the peasants revolted in 1381, John's London palace, the Savoy, was looted and then burned to the ground. Katherine, knowing her life and her family's were in danger, went into hiding, probably at one of John's northern castles.

Although the revolt finally subsided, it seems to have shaken John. Not only was his property destroyed, his members of his household had been murdered. A pious man, he concluded that God was punishing him for his liaison with Katherine. (Political realities may also have been a consideration, for he had become a highly unpopular man.)

He publicly broke off the nine year old affair, but also issued a "quit claim" that made it clear that any gifts and property he had given Katherine would remain hers. This document was issued on Valentine's Day.

And so, the lovers parted.

Despite this, John continued to provide patronage to their children and even to Chaucer's son, Katherine's nephew. Meanwhile, the political times were difficult. New favorites came and went and King Richard alternately depended on his uncle and turned on him.

But in 1394, Constance died. John, contrary to all advice and to the horror of several of the highest born ladies of the court, petitioned the Pope for dispensation to marry Katherine and to legitimize their children.

So at 46 and 56, they became husband and wife and, Katherine informed the Pope, they celebrated their wedding with "carnal copulation."

Until King Richard's marriage to his second wife, Katherine, Duchess of Lancaster, was the highest ranking woman in England. She and John had less than five years together before John's death and he was not well for most of that time. (John may not have been quite as faithful as his reputation. There's some suggestion that his illness was venereal disease.)

She survived five years after his death and lived to see John's son, Henry IV, refer to her, his stepmother, as "the King's Mother." A sketch of her tomb in Lincoln Cathedral is at left.

Her Cinderella story is virtually unduplicated in medieval history. It is a testament to a love that endured years, miles, marriages, guilt, and separation to find its own happy ending.

Source: Much of this material is drawn from Mistress of the Monarchy by Alison Weir, and The History of a Medieval Mistress by Jeanne Lucraft. Those who read my INNOCENCE UNVEILED may recognize that I used the birth of "John of Ghent," subsequently John of Gaunt, as a key incident in the book.

8 comments:

Karenmc said...

These two are somewhere back in my family tree, so thanks for the overview. I have the Weir book in my TBR pile. You've spurred me to pick it up sooner rather than later.

Blythe Gifford said...

If they are part of your family tree, then in addition to the English royal family, you may also be related to George Washington, both George Bushes, and a host of other luminaries, according to Weir.

Terry Blain said...

Good choice for a romantic couple, and one with great consequences on down the family tree.

I always liked the story of William Marshal who started out poor and eventually married well to Isabel de Clare to inherit her father’s title and lands as the 2nd Earl of Pembroke (of it could be because of my Pembroke Welsh Corgi, Bandit, that I’m so into the history of Pembroke shire).

Gail Zerrade said...

What a great love story! You did a fine job bringing these characters to life in the short space of a blog. And I appreciated the details on the historical sources.

Blythe Gifford said...

Terry - William Marshal's story is one of the great ones of the Middle Ages, as well. Gail - thanks for your comments. I've studied these two for some time and they DO feel real to me!

Virginia Gal said...

gosh this goes back a long time, I'm impressed with your research, particularly for a woman so clearly hidden in history!

Judy said...

Actually, the image you excerpted of the T&C Frontispiece is guessed (by George Williams) to be that of Constance of Castile, not Katherine Swynford (Williams has postulated that the woman cut-off to the viewer's left was Katherine).

If anyone wants to see that image, and more, you can find it at my website (http://katherineswynford.tk) or more information on her life at my blog (http:katherineswynford.blogspot.com).

Barbara Shanley said...

Barb Shanley: When I was in college in 1967-68 my roommate was a music major and had to go into NYC to a piano concert by a woman whose last name was DeRoet. I had read the book Katherine by Anya Seton, so I was aware of the name. The concert program described her as a descendent of Katherine DeRoet. I am sorry I cannot remember the pianist's first name. My roommate commented when I told her about who Miss DeRoet's ancestors were, "Well, I don't know anything about her royal ancestors, but she played royally, and beautifully."
T'would seem that the legendary "Katherine DeRoet Swynford, Duchess of Lancaster" has left quite an impressive geneological trail.