22 May 2012

Massacres: Roncevaux 778, Part I - A Medieval Massacre That Became Crusades Propaganda


By Kim Rendfeld
What happened at the Pass of Roncevaux in 778 was so traumatic no one wrote about it for decades, not while Emperor Charlemagne was alive. Yet a heavily altered version of the event became the basis of a poem to inspire Crusaders.

First, a little backstory: Three Saracen emirs from Hispania (Spain) visited King Charles, as he was known at the time, during his assembly in 777 at Paderborn to ask for his aid is overthrowing the Muslim ruler of Cordova. Perhaps the emirs told Charles Christian cities would welcome a Christian king. Perhaps they said the emir of Cordova would encroach on Frankish territory, as evidenced by a letter from Pope Hadrian referring to Charles’s fear of invasion. Saracens had invaded Francia in the past.

The original Royal Frankish Annals, Charles’s official record, say everything was hunky-dory. Charles marched into Hispania with a vast army, got hostages at Zaragoza, destroyed Pamplona (a Basque Christian city), subjugated the Basques (also called the Gascons), and returned home.

No mention at all of the Pass of Roncevaux in the Pyrenees.

What was so awful that Charles wanted it omitted? The earliest account of the battle, written in the Revised Royal Frankish Annals between 814 (the year Charles died) and 817, provides clues. The Reviser writes about the Basque ambushing the rear guard from the heights of the Pyrenees. Many high-ranking court officials died, the baggage train was plundered, and the enemy scattered in all directions. “To have suffered this wound shadowed the king’s view of his success in Spain,” the Reviser writes.

However, Einhard, writing a biography of Charles about 830-33, more than 50 years after the event, gives the most detailed description of the attack, which takes place as the sky is darkening: “In a densely wooded area well suited for ambush, the Basques had prepared to attack the army from the highest mountain. As the [Frankish] troops were proceeding in a long column through the narrow mountain passes, the Basques descended on the baggage train and the protecting rear guard and forced them into the valley. In the ensuing battle, the Basques slaughtered them to a man.”

Einhard also provides three names: Anselm, the count of the palace, Eggihard, the seneschal, and Hruodland (Roland), prefect of the March of Brittany. Einhard’s work is the only historical reference to Hruodland, the hero of my forthcoming novel, The Cross and the Dragon.

Fast forward to the 11th century, and you get a different take in “The Song of Roland.” A very different take. The poem says a lot about courage in the face of overwhelming odds and betrayal. But don’t look to it for historical accuracy. The most notable change is the enemy, Muslim Saracens, just like the Crusaders were fighting. The poem makes no mention of the Basques or of the Franks destroying a Christian city.

It was propaganda before the term existed.

Learn more about The Song of Roland in Kim's novel The Cross and the Dragon in Masscares: Roncevaux 778, Part II - Wed. May 23


Sources:
Einhard’s The Life of Charlemagne translated by Evelyn Scherabon Firchow and Edwin H. Zeydel

Carolingian Chronicles, which includes the Royal Frankish Annals and Nithard’s Histories, translated by Bernard Walter Scholz with Barbara Rogers

“The Song of Roland,” translated by John O'Hagan, www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/roland-ohag.asp

Caption info:

The Emperor Charlemagne Finds Roland's Corpse after the Battle of Roncevaux, c.1460, Jean Fouquet

Roland at Roncesvalles, c.1869, Odilon Redon

Illustration to The Song of Roland, 1903, Heorhiy Narbut


Kim Rendfeld is the author of The Cross and the Dragon, to be published by Fireship Press. For more about Kim and her fiction, visit www.kimrendfeld.com, read her blog at www.kimrendfeld.wordpress.com, like her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/authorkimrendfeld, or follow her on Twitter at @kimrendfeld.




4 comments:

J. S. Dunn said...

Great post, look forward to the novel.

J. S. Dunn

Nicolaas Vergunst said...

An enjoyable post, interesting and attractive, as is the blog itself. Congratulations. Your research into the historiography of Charlemagne drew me here. Could the absence of any reference to Roland's death have to do with him being seen as Charlemagne's beloved and brave-hearted nephew?

Kim Rendfeld said...

Thanks for the comments.

Roland's relationship with King Charles is unknown. He must have been important for Einhard to list him among the dead but likely was not Charles's nephew. The poem has him as a nephew because a sister's son was a close relationship in medieval times.

The purpose of the orginal annals was to make the boss look good. The boss--in this case King Charles--didn't read every word, but the writers probably were savvy enough to know he didn't want such a defeat reported.

Kim Rendfeld said...

In medieval times, a sister's son was an especially close relationship and was artistic license on the poet's part. Roland's true relationship with King Charles is unknown, but he must have been important for Einhard to name him.

The purpose of the annals was to make the boss look good. Charles probably did not read every word, but the annalists must have been savvy enough to know that Charles did not want the ambush mentioned.